3449
Comment:
|
7326
|
Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
Line 9: | Line 9: |
=== Coach meeting both coaches 18-3-2005 === Present:: SietskeKlooster, JunHu, LilianAdmiraal, JanvanderAsdonk, RutgerMenges, LaurieScholten ==== Discussion on the work we did ==== * We linked the research points together via a schematic, which was later made digitally. The conclusion we drew from here is that activity, experience and the environmental change were the most important key elements to focuss on. The relations from the most important elements were noted and we wrote down all the conclusions from this. we discussed the scenarios we created with some of the concepts and showed all the input and output paterns we concluded to. * Jun noted that the technique for one of our concepts, the Visor2000, already exists in some way, with a pair of goggles and small screen attached to it. * Sietske noted that there was a project called Third Eye which worked as a VR-goggle, whch had some similar technique. * Rutger explained all the earlier concepts we generated when not working from a completely finisched research stand point. * Sietske noted that it will be important to have a clear link between the (earlier) concepts and the research to show the various thinking methods. * Jun noted that we should think of more other modalities but Rutger justified this by stating that we choose those modalities due to our opinions and the feasibility of these modalities, and some of them are already being considered. Jan talks about this new company being able to create 3D images in the air, but the precise details are unkown. ==== Comments on the scenarios and concepts ==== * Jun states that it is good to use the whole environment and not focus on single aspects. Getting different people to have different views is a good thing, it influences experience and perspective. The Visor2000 does not look very feasible but Jan states that there is a phone company that uses the same technique only more basic and not interactive. Rutger notes that on ICEC there was this camera which recorder the position of your hand which would, in turn, unfluence a video. * Sietske noted that it is good to have all the directions coming from one point, keep using the space and nice to see how you think on influencing the storyline. Starting with a tv as the start point results in different ideas. What happens if you drop this thought, and focus on a empty space not based on the media center? Try to stream the concepts in 2 directions: near future and far future. We noted that this is also the way we wish to present the concepts to the client. One of the important things here is that we need to show clearly how the conecpts were generated and where they were based on. * Jun stated that the lighting part is good, and that we need to broaden it because no one uses the light as an interaction method. And weraing goggles or special clothing will not be the future so he preferres to not see one of these solutions. It would be interesting to have something were all walls will be screens, this will be the future, bigger screens all around you. * Sietske reacts to this by stating that the walls are interesting because they give other directions and perspectives. * Jun says that it would also be intersting to have more split screens and show the interaction, Jan notes that it is something we did not think of; having multiple screens interact with eachother, and that they will not only be unfluenced by the users. ==== Action points ==== * Next week we will be deepening our concepts and take care of the starting points and the directions. * Jun states that there should be clear links between the concepts and the research. * On thursday the concepts will be finished and we will work on the presentation format. * Jun says it could be good to put a light here and "play" with it to get some first-hand experience. |
Navigation(siblings, 1) TableOfContents
Please group your meeting minutes into categories, and put some logical order into them.
- some comments and reformatting [#cm0403 here]
Coach meeting both coaches 18-3-2005
Discussion on the work we did
- We linked the research points together via a schematic, which was later made digitally. The conclusion we drew from here is that activity, experience and the environmental change were the most important key elements to focuss on. The relations from the most important elements were noted and we wrote down all the conclusions from this. we discussed the scenarios we created with some of the concepts and showed all the input and output paterns we concluded to.
- Jun noted that the technique for one of our concepts, the Visor2000, already exists in some way, with a pair of goggles and small screen attached to it.
- Sietske noted that there was a project called Third Eye which worked as a VR-goggle, whch had some similar technique.
- Rutger explained all the earlier concepts we generated when not working from a completely finisched research stand point.
- Sietske noted that it will be important to have a clear link between the (earlier) concepts and the research to show the various thinking methods.
- Jun noted that we should think of more other modalities but Rutger justified this by stating that we choose those modalities due to our opinions and the feasibility of these modalities, and some of them are already being considered. Jan talks about this new company being able to create 3D images in the air, but the precise details are unkown.
Comments on the scenarios and concepts
- Jun states that it is good to use the whole environment and not focus on single aspects. Getting different people to have different views is a good thing, it influences experience and perspective. The Visor2000 does not look very feasible but Jan states that there is a phone company that uses the same technique only more basic and not interactive. Rutger notes that on ICEC there was this camera which recorder the position of your hand which would, in turn, unfluence a video.
- Sietske noted that it is good to have all the directions coming from one point, keep using the space and nice to see how you think on influencing the storyline. Starting with a tv as the start point results in different ideas. What happens if you drop this thought, and focus on a empty space not based on the media center? Try to stream the concepts in 2 directions: near future and far future. We noted that this is also the way we wish to present the concepts to the client. One of the important things here is that we need to show clearly how the conecpts were generated and where they were based on.
- Jun stated that the lighting part is good, and that we need to broaden it because no one uses the light as an interaction method. And weraing goggles or special clothing will not be the future so he preferres to not see one of these solutions. It would be interesting to have something were all walls will be screens, this will be the future, bigger screens all around you.
- Sietske reacts to this by stating that the walls are interesting because they give other directions and perspectives.
- Jun says that it would also be intersting to have more split screens and show the interaction, Jan notes that it is something we did not think of; having multiple screens interact with eachother, and that they will not only be unfluenced by the users.
Action points
- Next week we will be deepening our concepts and take care of the starting points and the directions.
- Jun states that there should be clear links between the concepts and the research.
- On thursday the concepts will be finished and we will work on the presentation format.
- Jun says it could be good to put a light here and "play" with it to get some first-hand experience.
Coach meeting Sietske Klooster 7-3-2005
Together with Sietske we also spoke about our vision and changed this vision Dc222Home/OurVision.
Coach meeting Jun Hu 4-3-2005
- Present
JunHu, LaurieScholten, RutgerMenges, LilianAdmiraal, JanvanderAsdonk
- Issues discussed
The new everyday is a book that can give you a vision, but it doesn’t go in deep to our subject, it is hard to get a focus. It has to be ambitious.
You may find these reports here:
[http://www.hitech-projects.com/euprojects/nextv/ NexTV], Final report: [http://www.hitech-projects.com/euprojects/nextv/reports/NexTV-Final-Report.pdf PDF]
[http://www.hitech-projects.com/euprojects/icecream/ ICE-CREAM], Final Report: [http://www.hitech-projects.com/euprojects/icecream/deliverables/d22-final-report-icecream.pdf PDF]